Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: bellovar@***.WISC.EDU
Subject: Re: PERSONA SCAN COMMENCING
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 93 10:54:43 CST
>>>>>[#$%%^%675gHJKFKJjkhjfdl -- --- ----- ---- -
----]<<<<<
>>>>>[The following message has been encoded only to appear
to specific persona configurations that correlate to specific
users. PERSONA CONFIRMED. DOWNLOAD MESSAGE COMMENCING]<<<<<

>>>>>[ Guys - An idea - pay attention.....

NightStalker - You know how you suggested that DOA should
go look around in Precision's data fortress? That got me
thinking and I had an odd idea.

Now how many of the deckers around here are following the things
going on about DOA and Precision as well as with another corp
(we all know which one I am referring to I believe) Now I ask
you.... If we set a plan in advance, how many deckers could we
get together on a mass raid so to speak.

Personally, I am not the best decker in the world by any stretch
of the imagination, nor am I even close to be even considered
with any of the big guns, I am a rigger more than a decker, but
I have seen what two decks can do to even Black IC, and I imagine
some of us may even know of some back doors.......

You tell me - a bad idea? We could even have some people come in
via a neural cap rather than via a datajack. Now before I hear
complaints on the lack of finesse with a neural cap, if my mentor
was right, Black IC can't touch those with neural caps as there is
no direct linkage.... we could leave the finesse part to those
directly jacked in.... and the Black IC to those with the
induction headsets.... You guys tell me... is it feasible? ]<<<<<
-- CrossFire <10:42:09/02-11-54>

>>>>>[OVERWRITE COMMENCING....]<<<<<
>>>>>[SCRAMBLE FILE COMMENCING]<<<<<
>>>>>[FILE DUMP COMMENCING....]<<<<<
>>>>>[FILE PURGED.............]<<<<<

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about PERSONA SCAN COMMENCING, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.