Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: "Jason Carter, Nightstalker" <CARTER@***.EDU>
Subject: Powerhouse's sword
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1993 15:37:39 -0700
>>>>>[ Raven, I need you to do me a favor. I'm sending Regent to the
library.
Could you go with him to talk to Golem? I need him to come down the the
Carribean astrally. We need his enchanter expertise to tell us something about
Powerhouse's sword. ]<<<<<
-- Princess <15:41:16/10-15-54>

>>>>>[ Give it up, Princess. There is no way in hell that sword will be
able to
tell us anything more than it has. It's fragging broken! ]<<<<<
-- Cerise <15:42:42/10-15-54>

>>>>>[ If I'm right, Cerise, it will be possible to put it back together
and
save the enchantment. Whatever broke it was not magical in nature, so the magic
was not attacked. Only the sword is broken. The magic is very weak, but it is
not dead. ]<<<<<
-- Princess <15:44:20/10-15-54>

>>>>>[ Not yet, you mean. We've been watching it fade away alittle bit at
a
time. ]<<<<<
-- Cerise <15:45:45/10-15-54>

>>>>>[ That's why time is of the essence. ]<<<<<
-- Princess <15:45:59/10-15-54>
Message no. 2
From: What ? <M.C.Mohan@****.AC.UK>
Subject: PowerHouse's Sword
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 1994 14:02:44 GMT
PowerHouse's sword has left Seattle. In fact it was stolen in a well plan
theft. The thief is believed to be an English elf called WHAT. A lot of proof
points towards him. With quite some digging, it is possible to find out that
he pull a couple of favours and pulled a quick faded to Berlin under the
assumed name Martin Davis ( with a fake SIN too). WHAT also paid the fixer
extra for illegal Items transport ......

WHAT was a know drinking pal of PH and runs mainly in Seattle.

Draw your own conclusions, most of them bad.

Thanks Mike for the mess. :-)


Mark M.

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Powerhouse's sword, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.