Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: "E.S. Brunsell" <ericb@***.WISC.EDU>
Subject: sale
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 1994 14:32:11 CST
>>>>>[Gawk, I'll have the equipment you ordered at the ENCRYPT:##LOCATION##
It was a tough order, Heavy and quick, but you had the money and I got the
stuff. Don't shoot it all off at once.]<<<<<
--Couch <..:..:.. / ..-..-..>
--
Message no. 2
From: EBruns@***.COM
Subject: sale
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 1996 21:14:26 -0500
*****PRIVATE: Shadowfox
>>>>>[My source has the information on who hired him and the official
transaction file. Much of the operation's details have been corrupted, but a
skilled decker may be able to perform a little reconstructive surgery. It's
definately "some assembly required," but then again the price is not too
high. If you are willing to float the cash, the source will contact you
personally.]<<<<<
-- Marcus <20:13:22/11-23-57>
Message no. 3
From: Mike Goldberg <michael.goldberg@*******.COM>
Subject: Re: sale
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 1996 20:24:26 MST
***** Private: Marcus
>>>>>[ Interesting. I will be willing to pay >>encrypted<< for
it. I
would in addition be willing to pay >>encrypted<< as an arrangement fee to
you in order for you to set up a meet for myself and your source. Assuming
I like what your source has to say, I will pay the source well for the
information. ]<<<<<
-- Shadowfox <03:07:09/11-24-57>

***** Private: Sprinkler, Scourge
>>>>>[ Got another potential lead from Marcus. Since he is setting up a
meet with his "source", I want all information that can be found on him,
and I sort of need it yesterday. ]<<<<<
-- Shadowfox <03:10:02/11-23-57>

***** Private: Shadowfox, Scourge
>>>>>[ How loud should I be? ]<<<<<
-- Sprinkler <03:11:23/11-23-57>

***** Private: Sprinkler, Shadowfox
>>>>>[ Come on, lad, you cannot be that loud because everyone knows you
work for Shadowfox. I, on the other hand, have an excellent reason to dig
up dirt on Marcus. I can use it to gauge whether I want to land some more
work for my company. ]<<<<<
-- Scourge <03:13:03/11-23-57>

***** Not to: Marcus
>>>>>[ Hello. Been a busy week. My company has managed to acquire a new
location, and we expect within the week to resume work. My thanks to
Whirlwind for doubling my insurance rate.

Speaking of rates, I'm thinking of pursuing a new contract and was
wondering what people know about Marcus. Any useful information will be
well rewarded. I just want to make sure I don't step on his toes (too
hard) if I design new security for the company he made some money off of.
]<<<<<
-- Scourge <03:17:25/11-23-57>

>>>>>[ Boring. Stale. Wait a second. You are going to do another freeze
job for a place. Awesome. Another place I'll have to visit and scout
around. Looking forward to the challenges. ]<<<<<
-- Ratspeak <03:19:26/24-NOV-57>

***** Private: Nightmare
>>>>>[ So far nothing interesting to report. Here is the easy info that I
have acquired on them. Nothing out of the ordinary. As we expected, our
most notable friend has a SIN, and all the information involved with that
is included in my first report. Something smells funny though. I'll keep
digging.

+++++ transfer personel.files]<<<<<
-- Ratspeak <03:21:41/24-NOV-57>
Message no. 4
From: EBruns@***.COM
Subject: sale
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 1996 21:01:04 -0500
*****PRIVATE: Shadowfox
>>>>>[I am Marcus' contact. I'll meet you at
>>>ENCRYPTED<<< and detail the
files. In return, I seek help with some matrix detective work.]<<<<<
-- Stewart Thao <20:00:00/11-25-57>
Message no. 5
From: Mike Goldberg <michael.goldberg@*******.COM>
Subject: Re: sale
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 1996 21:02:03 MST
***** Private: Stewart Thao
>>>>>[ Most excellent. I'll bring some personal recommendations for people
who might be able to help you out. See you at >>encrypted<<
]<<<<<
-- Shadowfox <21:00:43/11-25-57>

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about sale, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.