Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Louis Frederick <LRFREDERICK@****.BITNET>
Subject: strange....
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1993 19:05:10 -0500
****ENCRYPTSUN****
>>>>>[Sun, I may have a lead but I'm not too fond of the way it's pointing
on of the uh, patrons of Rager's managed to get ahold of me. He told me that
a friend of his disapeared from the club the night before a pickup?/delivery
i'm thinking of having a decker friend of mine run a check of disappearances
and crossmatching them with the local "tough" clubs. Any
thoughts?]<<<<<
-- Silver Tux (19:02:47/08:09:54)
Message no. 2
From: Jon W{tte <d88-jwa@****.KTH.SE>
Subject: Strange
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 1994 09:55:49 +0200
>>>>>[ Funny. I had a customer yesterday afternoon, and all he wanted
me to do was rub his feet and make coffee. He kindly turned me down
when I offered my extra caring routine. It seemed as if he was
waiting for something or someone who never showed up.

The guys name was "Topler" or something like that, 50ish and on the
next-to-highest floor of the Scitex building. (the view was great
though :-)

Any clues welcome! (I didn't even catch the company he was working
for, if any. Really low-key it seemed) ]<<<<<
-- Pet <9.58.27 GMT+1/55-04-15>
Message no. 3
From: Jaimie Nicholson <jaimie.nicholson@********.OTAGO.AC.NZ>
Subject: Strange
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 1997 11:02:32 +1200
*****PRIVATE: Ice
>>>>>[I saw a guy today in downtown Jakarta who could have been your long
lost twin brother. I turned to Michael to get him to take a look, and when
I turned back to point the double out, he had just taken off, sprinting
around a corner for no apparent reason. My natural hunting instinct had me
four or five steps into chasing him before I realised that I had no reason
to do so. It was pretty strange.]<<<<<
-- ThunderStone <14:56:57/11-06-58>

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Strange, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!