Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: "Mark L. Neidengard" <mneideng@****.CALTECH.EDU>
Subject: Re: Togo?!
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 13:35:41 -0800
>>>>>[What the hell was that? Hey, sysadmin-type people... you guys suffer
a lapse in your IC recently or something? A host like "Togo Medical
Research Station 3" shouldn't be able to just get on without a user ID
associated with it. At least, not by "accident" if they dialog from our
nameless friends is to be taken at face value.

*sigh* What's the net coming to these days?
]<<<<<
-- Azrael <13:09:00 / 03-16-59>


*****PRIVATE: Azrael
>>>>>[
+++++administrative channel
Need I remind you that you are nothing more than a mere user here? I don't
feel like hearing you whining about how we should run our system.
]<<<<<
-- Black Spiral <13:13:36 / 03-16-59>


*****PRIVATE: Black Spiral
>>>>>[Don't give me that bullshit, man. You were the one all hot about
the "quality of information" when you got elected onto the Cabal: I can quote
your damn speech if you want. You're not the sort of decker that spouts this
bull: just admit you fucked up and fix it. Or are you still in a bad mood
after that frame kicked your ass? From what I heard it almost cost your
deck.]<<<<<
-- Azrael <13:15:24 / 03-16-59a>

*****PRIVATE: Azrael
>>>>>[FUCK YOU, ASSHOLE! I don't take that shit from ANYONE! I'm gonna
take
your fucking persona and feed it to the +++++signal integrity lost

>Yo, Spiral. What the hell do you think you're doing, falling for a reverse-
>burn message like that? A freshman Renraku MIS goon could avoid that. Have
>you lost your shit or what?

+++++central hub override

>>> Azrael: that will be quite enough. I appreciate your concern for our
>>> security and our staff, but breaching core ops security and knocking
>>> ops staff unconscious is more than I will permit. Rest assured that we
>>> will see to the integrity of both our data and our staff. Including
>>> patching the little back door you so kindly notified us of just now.

>Understood, man...I'm going. Happy coding and all that jazz.

>>> Likewise.
+++++connection closed
]<<<<<
-- Black Spiral <13:18:58 / 03-16-59>
Message no. 2
From: Brian Angliss <angliss@*****.COLORADO.EDU>
Subject: Re: Togo?!
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 15:11:20 -0700
>>>>>[It wasn't an accident, dammit. I logged on intentionally, intending
to reveal some wonderful, fantastic news and instead discovered that
nearly 10 months of work was a complete waste of time! "Togo Medical
Research Station 3" was appended because the system required a default
address, and that's where I happened to be located at the time.]<<<<<
-- Action Jackson <15:00:17/03-16-59>

*****PRIVATE: Action Jackson
>>>>>[You fraggin peice of drek, you get a message and walk out of the
clinic and then vanish for 9 months?! You didn't tell anyone where you
were going, when or even if you were going to be back, and then you just
appear out of nowhere again? That fraggin blows, AJ. Your friends are
not thrilled, and I imagine that Diana is more than just a tad pissed
too.]<<<<<
-- Slash and Foxey Roxey <15:05:49/03-16-59>

*****PRIVATE: Slash, Foxey Roxey
>>>>>[What the frag? You two shacking up or
something?]<<<<<
-- Action Jackson <15:07:33/03-16-59>

*****PRIVATE: Action Jackson
>>>>>[He wishes. No, we're just in the bar at the same time, that's
all. Where the frag are you?]<<<<<
-- Foxey Roxey <15:09:09/03-16-59>

*****PRIVATE: Foxey Roxey, Slash
>>>>>[At home, taking inventory to make sure everything's still
here. I'd be asleep if I wasn't still on Togo time.]<<<<<
-- Action Jackson <15:10:12/03-16-59>

*****PRIVATE: Action Jackson, Diana
>>>>>[Ok, AJ's back in town, and he's at home currently. Let's meet there
to see what the frag he's been up to these last several months. And he
needs to be brought up to date on some stuff, like the clinic.]<<<<<
-- Slash <15:12:44/03-16-59>
Message no. 3
From: "Mark L. Neidengard" <mneideng@****.CALTECH.EDU>
Subject: Re: Togo?!
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 14:21:28 -0800
>>>>>[My goodness, there's a handle I haven't seen in a long time. Good to
see you back online, though apparently under suboptimal circumstances. As for
the defaulting, well, computers are mysterious machines, aren't they...
]<<<<<
-- Azrael <14:19:30 / 03-16-59>
Message no. 4
From: Brion Wauters <stu2204@****.COCO.CC.AZ.US>
Subject: Re: Togo?!
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 15:17:00 -0700
>>>>>[I'll be damned! AJ! I thought you had gone straight and become a
proper, respecatable citizen.]<<<<<
-- Irish <15:16:45/16-03-59>
Message no. 5
From: Brian Angliss <angliss@*****.COLORADO.EDU>
Subject: Re: Togo?!
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 15:35:03 -0700
>>>>>[Let's just say that if anyone ever claims to have found a cure,
>>>>>they're lying through thier teeth. Although this one seemed
>>>>>close....]<<<<
-- Action Jackson <15:36:26/03-16-59>
Message no. 6
From: Brian Angliss <angliss@*****.COLORADO.EDU>
Subject: Re: Togo?!
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 15:58:41 -0700
>>>>>[The day Dr. Jackson becomes a respectible citizen is the day I
retire.]<<<<<
-- Commander Drake, InterPol <15:54:52/03-16-59>

*****INTERNAL: InterPol Internal Memo to Jose Montoya
>>>>>[Monty, my favorite target has just returned home. Looks like he was
>>>>>at some research station in Togo until yesterday. Send a couple of
>>>>>people there to verify his presence. Don't move AJ to the top of the
>>>>>list just yet, though. We've got other fish to fry, and our Seattle
>>>>>presence to boost up again.]<<<<<
-- Commander Drake <15:59:35/03-16-59>
Message no. 7
From: Chuck McKenzie <kilroy@**.WISC.EDU>
Subject: Re: Togo?!
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 17:38:39 -0600
*****PRIVATE: Action Jackson
>>>>>[ My my, the old men really are crawling out of their graves.
We expect to see Ms. V any day now. Welcome back. ]<<<<<
-- Jen & Gabe <17:05:39/03-16-59>
Message no. 8
From: Mark Imbriaco <perlhacker@*********.NET>
Subject: Re: Togo?!
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 19:03:00 -0500
>>>>>[ Well I'll be damned. Another blast from the past as it were. Glad
to see you back -- too few of the old guard are still around these parts.
Since
you're back in town, I've got a few things that I'd like to discuss with you
when you get a chance -- some business propositions. ]<<<<<
-- Griffyn <19:02:41/03-16-59>
Message no. 9
From: Mark Imbriaco <perlhacker@*********.NET>
Subject: Re: Togo?!
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 19:06:59 -0500
>>>>>[ That all depends on your definition of respectable, Drake. I would,
and
have for that matter, trust AJ with my life. Not many would I afford such a
degree of faith.

I suppose that this little posting means that your personal witch-hunt is
back on. That's good -- the streets were becoming far to docile. ]<<<<<
-- Griffyn <19:06:41/03-16-59>
Message no. 10
From: Erik Jameson <erikj@****.COM>
Subject: Re: Togo?!
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 19:31:58 -0500
>>>>>[Uh oh everybody, get out of the pool. AJ and Drake are back...just
when things were starting to calm down a bit...]<<<<<
-- Trebuchet <16:14:52/03-16-59>
Message no. 11
From: Justin Fang <justinf@****.CALTECH.EDU>
Subject: Re: Togo?!
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 17:12:23 -0800
>>>>>[Quick, someone convince AJ to become a respectable citizen. Drake
retiring is something I just *gotta* see. Can't you just imagine him
relaxing on a beach sipping one of those drinks with the little umbrellas?
<<<<<
-- Sam-I-Am <17:10:03/03-16-59>
Message no. 12
From: Erik Jameson <erikj@****.COM>
Subject: Re: Togo?!
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 20:12:47 -0500
>>>>>[Oh come on now Griffyn, do you have to egg him on? Are you bucking
to be on the top of his list now that he's back? Leave him alone and maybe
he'll leave you alone.]<<<<<
-- Wildsmasher <19:09:41/03-16-59>
Message no. 13
From: "Paul J. Adam" <shadowtk@********.DEMON.CO.UK>
Subject: Re: Togo?!
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 01:19:01 +0000
*****PRIVATE: Action Jackson
>>>>>[Hey, AJ, good to see you back in contact. Things have gone
downhill in your absence, shall we say?

Still running a clinic, or have you moved on from that? (I only ask
because there are damn few cybersurgeons in Seattle I'd trust to tweak
my gear... in fact, normally none since you dropped out of sight)

Anyhow, one way or another, good to have you back.]<<<<<
-- Lynch <01:16:43/03-17-59>
Message no. 14
From: "Paul J. Adam" <shadowtk@********.DEMON.CO.UK>
Subject: Re: Togo?!
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 02:27:24 +0000
>>>>>[No, I can't...

Sam-I-Am, Drake lives his work. He won't quit, there's too much dirt out
there and he can't turn his back on it for long.

Besides, I have it from fair to middling sources that he's not a
cocktail drinker.]<<<<<
-- Lynch <02:27:54/03-17-59>
Message no. 15
From: "Paul J. Adam" <shadowtk@********.DEMON.CO.UK>
Subject: Re: Togo?!
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 02:30:13 +0000
>>>>>[Which streets did you think were docile, Griff? You want some
action, we can usually oblige you around here. Latest problem is some
bunch of bozos running a brothel in our turf without asking us or
offering us any consideration. I may have to speak harshly to them, and
beat them when they sneeze. They only do it to annoy...]<<<<<
-- Easy <02:29:36/03-17-59>
Message no. 16
From: Mark Imbriaco <perlhacker@*********.NET>
Subject: Re: Togo?!
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 23:51:22 -0500
>>>>>[ I'm not currently on anyone's fugitive list, so there is very little
chance that Drake is going to come after me. Color me unconcerned. ]<<<<<
-- Griffyn <23:25:12/03-16-59>
Message no. 17
From: Mark Imbriaco <perlhacker@*********.NET>
Subject: Re: Togo?!
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 23:52:07 -0500
>>>>>[ That sounds like an interesting diversion for an evening, Easy. By
all
means, let's take out the garbage. ]<<<<<
-- Griffyn <23:28:41/03-16-59>
Message no. 18
From: Brian Angliss <angliss@*****.COLORADO.EDU>
Subject: Re: Togo?!
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 11:13:24 -0700
*****PRIVATE: Jen and Gabe
>>>>>[You two are still around? Great..... Thanks for the hearty
welcome.]<<<<<
-- Action Jackson <11:14:41/03-017-59>

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Togo?!, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.