Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "J.R. Norton" <jrn1@**.AC.UK>
Subject: F.U.C.
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 93 14:29:21 GMT
>>>>[ F.U.C. How dare you try to shrug me off like some ten bit Fuchi 5 owner.
I do not care what you may have picked up on the english grapevine. I try to
operate quitly and descreatly that may be why you believe I seem to be of no
real sinificance. But before you make some remark you will suggest you take a
look at the file on myself at Intergrated Weapon Sys at Nottingham. That is
if you can make it past the custom ice (data store 6 subprocessor 2).
I have had more training in covert decking operations than you could ever dream
of. You think by trying to caste a shadow across my character it will get you
marks. I will not stand for it.
I have had access to more military soft/hardware over the last ten years than y
ou have probably smelt. I dont do this for a living I do it because I enjoy and
I am good at it. And that makes me all the more dangerous because I pick up
contracts on what I wish not because some lousy corp offers me less than I
make in a week.
If the data you have picked up about myself concerns the run I made against
ZETA-IMP where I was stopped I believe you are miss informed the whole point of
that exercise was to test the instalation of some new ICE to be exect the ice
which I helped design with some friends of mine. So I suggest befor fobbing me
of you try to examine a few worthy data stores and not some second rate one you
seem to be kissing at FUCHI cambridge. Oh and you can tell them from me that
the their new dragon six upgrade sucks.]<<<<<
-White Knight (14:26:12/02-03-54)



>>>>[ Highlander if you catch site of FUC please contact me my deck is set
to secondary scan mode to receive your message. This is a matter of honor the
glove is down and I claim my right to deal with this slanderer]<<<<
-White Knight (14:30:25/02-03-54)

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.