Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "M.W.Daniels, 317.276.1590" <DANIELS_MICHAEL_W@*****.COM>
Subject: Amelia!!!!!
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1993 22:43:20 -0500
>>>>>[Blessed be, Lady Love! It has, indeed, been far too long since we've
had
the opportunity to discuss life and lore over tea and cigarettes. (I still
don't know where you get that tobacco.) I will admonish you for the 'old
professor' comment. You're not _that_ old, and you certainly don't have the
school-marmy look about you.

I do apologize for not recognizing your projection in the City by the Bay, but
as I'm sure you'll recall, I was a tad busy. What was that twinning business,
anyway? I'd certainly like to enter into that kind of union with you if
possible. Do you gain benefit of combined magicks? Knowledge? Such bonding I
have only heard of in legend, and then only between true blood twins, or
oathbound lovers. Is there something I should know?

If you've had tea with the Drui, it must be important. I'm sending a list of
artifacts directly to yet another of your artifacts. Look for it on the
linotype in your home alcove.

As for the bracelet on my cyberlimbed friend, I can only ask you to get it off
of him. I know if it is of your creation, it's effects will only be helpful (or
at least benign) to him, but he's overreacting to it a bit (designed for those
of us whose bodies are undefiled, I presume - though I could stand a bit more
revenge on him. Few men have ever had me that drunk, that -um- distracted, and
then simply left). *humph*

And something more puzzles me. If you created the bracelet, how in the name of
the Gods did it leave your side? And what's L'yenthl got to do with all this?
Don't leave me in the dark, k'chara.]<<<<<

-- Millhaus <22:34:25/18-Jul-54>

From: DANIELS MICHAEL W (MCVAX0::RX65815)

To: VMS MAIL ADDRESSEE (IN::"shadowtk@*****.bitnet")

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.