Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: ANGLISS BRIAN EDWARD <angliss@****.colorado.edu>
Subject: Re: Another smartass comment
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 1995 23:32:49 -0700 (MST)
>>>>>[Seven fraggin years? Wow.

Is that all?]<<<<<
-- Slash <23:11:34/12-08-56>

>>>>>[All this drek is starting to get annoying, you two. Righteous and
Dana fragged over a friend, and that shatters trust. Not a smart thing
to do on the best of days. But if you two operate as crazy as you brag
you do, you'll have more runners gunning for you than they do right now.
You see, R&D fragged one person, but you two risk bringing the corps,
InterPol, Lone Star, the Mafia and yaks, and everyone else down on
EVERYONE'S fraggin heads. Seattle is a close knit shadow community, and
if you prove yourself to it, it'll let you in. But imagine how many
runners you'll frag with if the drek hits the fan in Seattle because of
you? If R&D have some 5 or 6 runners after them for fraggin with one
person, who rep in Seattle is a bit tarnished anyway(sorry, AJ, but it's
true and you know it), what happens when everyone gets fragged over?
There won't be a place on the fraggin planet you can hide, and you can
brag all you fraggin want to, no-one, probably not even a fraggin greater
dragon, can stand up to the massed might of the Seattle shadows.

And yes, it is a threat. And if it doesn't scare the drek out of you,
you're both fraggin looped. And if you don't SHUT YOUR FRAGGIN YAPS
RIGHT FRAGGIN NOW, I'LL HUNT YOU BOTH DOWN AND BLAST YOU INTO YOUR NEXT
FRAGGIN LIVES!!!!]<<<<<
-- Foxey Roxey <23:27:11/12-08-56>

>>>>>[Roxey, I must admit, you've definately calmed down since having
Arial. A couple of years ago, they'd have been blasted into thier
component atoms by now.]<<<<<
-- Action Jackson <23:29:47/12-08-56>

>>>>>[Frag off and die, AJ. (now, that's not very nice, roxey) You too,
Max. (tsk tsk tsk)]<<<<<
-- Foxey Roxey <23:30:54/12-08-56>

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.