Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "Mark A. Imbriaco" <mark@******.net>
Subject: Citadel
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 1996 13:29:34 -0400 (EDT)
*****INTERNAL: MCT Internal Communication
>>>>>[ FROM: Roger Yamato, Director of Special Operations, UCAS
TO: Tetsiro Yoshi, Director of MCT Computer Security Services,

Seattle

Report.

"Sir. We've had more complaints about the Citadel incident. What is the
position that I should take with our customers?"

Cover their losses on the stipulation that they keep quiet about the incident.
Remind them that the licensing agreement that they signed excluded us from
responsibility for damages related to using the software. Have all of the
affected sites been patched?

"Yes sir. Security discovered some information about a shipment of high-end
computing hardware that were stolen from a Fuchi warehouse approximately a
week ago. We believe the intrude may have used these components to build
a system to attack all of the affected sites simulatenously."

Good. Follow up on that, then. I want whoever was responsible for this.
Speaking of which, has the Seattle security captain who reported the intruder
eliminated been reprimanded yet?

"Yes sir. The body was identified by his second-in-command this morning."

Very good. Keep me informed. I don't want any more surprises. ]<<<<<
-- MCT Internal Communication <13:23:38/06-06-57>

*****PRIVATE: Flux
>>>>>[

+++++ Watchdog triggered. Keyword identified: Citadel
+++++ Blind Carbon-Copying Message. Complete.
+++++ Standby mode activated.

]<<<<<
-- Watchdog <13:23:38/06-06-57>

*****PRIVATE: Flux
>>>>>[

+++++ Watchdog error! Program crashing. Respawing Watchdog.
+++++ Watchdog error! Program crashing. Respawing Watchdog.
+++++ Watchdog error! Program crashing. Respawing Watchdog.
+++++ Watchdog err*(^%)(!#%&)*&%

+++++ MESSAGE TERMINATED ]<<<<<
-- Watchdog <13:28:12/06-06-57>

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.