Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Marathon@*******.DEMON.CO.UK
Subject: Re: Info wanted...
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 1997 22:39:20 +0000
>>>>>[If you are not affiliated with Humanis and their paramilitary
attitude towards racial supremacy, then you have my apology. However,
by all accounts Thunda was associated with the Humanis, and had worked
for/with them before, the fact that you claim Thunda was killed
illegally, indicated that you sympathised with his belief. I made the
mistake of not keeping your original comments and thus cannot quote the
sections that gave across that opinion. You do not believe in killing
as a politial matter, yet you are prepared to defend the lawful slaying
of a rabid animal, who was killing for the shere hell of death and
profit. Thunda did not hold with any political beliefs, he killed
because he enjoyed it. Your defence of that creature, is admission of
similar beliefs, no amount of denial on your part will ever change the
opinions of the people who have read your comments.

You did not directly say as far as I recall that Lynch, or his
organisation were fascists, but his name, that of his organisation, and
the words "fascist sons of Satan" occured in the same sentence with no
obvious seperating punctuation to imply that they should be considered
seperate statements, the implication is thus defined that you called
Lynch, his company, and all upholders of law and order fascists.


To be honest, though I have no interest whatsoever in you or your
beliefs, I will visit the site you mention and have a look at your
claims to immortality. One last thing, I have no reason to watch what I
say. People hree know I am sometimes belligerent, often opinionated,
and mostly outspoken. i do not insult people directly, nor accuse them
of roles in life to which they are not suited, I have not and never have
been accused of slander or insult. I have, on many occassions labelled
attitudes into sections of society, often the people associated with
those attitudes or statements are not a part of that section of society,
but I do not usualy label people, unless they are so obviously
portraying their beliefs in that area of life that it is difficult not
to. As it was in your case. And for your information, Lynch does not
work for a so-called "security" agency. he works for an Intelligence
agency, there is, strangely enough, a very big difference. Also, as far
as I am aware, according to what I have accumulated concerning his
organisation, they are no "Free Lance", but closely associated with the
UCAS government. Another two mistakes you have made. The last thing
that should be remarked upon, especially seeing as I have it in front of
me here, is that there was a dead or alive warrant out for Thunda. That
means that he was wanted by federal agencies, agencies employed,
governed and sanctioned by the UCAS government, wanted dead OR alive.
Thunda was a known combat monster who was addicted to a cocktail of
combat drugs and immunosuppressants. Meaning that it would be extremely
dangerous, if not impossible to take him alive. You accused Lynch of
murder when it was a lawful killing. Would you also say that the deaths
caused by Thunda were unlawful, and would you be so kind as to explain
to the people who suffered the loss of loved ones why you are defending
a murderous animal.

++++Include: Moon_Views.vid

That will give you an idea of what Thunda did, and if you phone the trid
station you will find that they will happily give you the results of the
survey they carried out at the end of the show. Seattle unanimously
decided it was a lawful killing, and only the sympathisers and bigots of
this city were in defence of him, yet none phoned in and stated so, they
merely warbled to gutter press reporters in dark alleys, from dark
shadows, keeping their anonimity, too cowardly to stand up and announce
themselves as sympathisers for what was a nasty piece of filth.


I don't know of any recent assassinations nor massive background
stories, to cover for them. Maybe you would cease being so vague and
make a firm statement for a change.


I mean you, as well as Troglobyte. If Troglobyte trashed your deck,
then more power to him, and he has an apology from me for my previous
rant at him. however I still feel that he was acting rashly when he
threw his challenge at you so publicly, as I feel you were ineptly
stupid in your arbitrary comments to Lynch. Can you possibly imagine
what this board would become if everyone started throwing insults and
threatened physical retaliation at each other? it would be worse than a
brawl game, and far less enjoyable.


If you feel the need to take me to court and begin a law suit because I
have called you ineptly stupid, please attempt to do so, unlike you, I
don't have a paper trail, or company affiliation that you can follow.
Good luck in finding me.


Prat.]<<<<<
-- Marathon <22:36:17/03-28-58>

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.